Wednesday, January 22, 2003
Google Search: time warner cable mixup
Do a search for Time Warner Cable...click on the 1st link. It's suppose to go to www.timewarner.com but ends up going to http://www.pathfinder.com/pathfinder/index.html The reason? It might be this:
Two possible scenarios (for want of more information I'll have to speculate a bit here):
1. Your subscriber can access his domain as usual by entering the URL in his browser's address field.
In this case, it's most probably a Google issue. We've seen this before when Google pointed to an old, expired domain that wasn't active anymore, redirecting visitors to another, entirely unrelated one.
This false linking can only be remedied by Google.
2. Your subscriber is being redirected to that third party's setup even when entering his own URL in the browser address field.
2.1 This could indicate a nameserver issue, possibly on TLD level. The reasons could be manifold, with domain hijacking being the most likely, seeing that his content seems to have been stolen, as he reports.
This could only be remedied by the nameserver service employed.
2.2 Alternatively, the hijacker might have manipulated the domain's nameserver IPs with the legitimate owner's domain name provider. He might even have transferred ownership of the domain to himself. (E.g. if the culprit got hold of his access codes.)
This could only be remedied by the domain name provider employed.
(There've been legal precedents indicating that this would also make for a pretty good case in court, but of course only an expert lawyer could tell your client what to do and what his chances in a lawsuit would be.)
All of the above are, of course, under the assumption that his domain hasn't expired and been taken up by someone else in a regular manner.
As for copyright infringement issues, the usual rules apply: if he can prove that his copyright has indeed been violated, and if he can pinpoint the perpetrator, legal counsel is advised -- generally, I'd assume that his chances in court should be pretty high. - Ralph aka Fantomaster
Note: This material was created by Jill Whalen [jill@highrankings.com]...a respected SEO...she had this same question asked to her by another person's page getting hijacked by a major competitor.
I hope Google is getting it's act together...this is looking pretty messed up the search engine world...
Do a search for Time Warner Cable...click on the 1st link. It's suppose to go to www.timewarner.com but ends up going to http://www.pathfinder.com/pathfinder/index.html The reason? It might be this:
Two possible scenarios (for want of more information I'll have to speculate a bit here):
1. Your subscriber can access his domain as usual by entering the URL in his browser's address field.
In this case, it's most probably a Google issue. We've seen this before when Google pointed to an old, expired domain that wasn't active anymore, redirecting visitors to another, entirely unrelated one.
This false linking can only be remedied by Google.
2. Your subscriber is being redirected to that third party's setup even when entering his own URL in the browser address field.
2.1 This could indicate a nameserver issue, possibly on TLD level. The reasons could be manifold, with domain hijacking being the most likely, seeing that his content seems to have been stolen, as he reports.
This could only be remedied by the nameserver service employed.
2.2 Alternatively, the hijacker might have manipulated the domain's nameserver IPs with the legitimate owner's domain name provider. He might even have transferred ownership of the domain to himself. (E.g. if the culprit got hold of his access codes.)
This could only be remedied by the domain name provider employed.
(There've been legal precedents indicating that this would also make for a pretty good case in court, but of course only an expert lawyer could tell your client what to do and what his chances in a lawsuit would be.)
All of the above are, of course, under the assumption that his domain hasn't expired and been taken up by someone else in a regular manner.
As for copyright infringement issues, the usual rules apply: if he can prove that his copyright has indeed been violated, and if he can pinpoint the perpetrator, legal counsel is advised -- generally, I'd assume that his chances in court should be pretty high. - Ralph aka Fantomaster
Note: This material was created by Jill Whalen [jill@highrankings.com]...a respected SEO...she had this same question asked to her by another person's page getting hijacked by a major competitor.
I hope Google is getting it's act together...this is looking pretty messed up the search engine world...
Other Links Related to This Story
posted by Brian & Brian at 3:01 PM
0 comments - add your comment here!
![]()
Friday, January 03, 2003
Yahoo! Buys Inktomi For $235 Million
As the search engine mergers continue to grow, it seems more than apparant that yahoo! and google are going to stay strong. For the tech-heads, Google still reigns supreme while Yahoo! offers more for the general consumer. Let's just hope they mix like oil and water. Rumors are flying that Google will go public in 2003. However, this might be a problem...now the great Google ideas will be corrupted by the corporate "cog". Or will it? Time will only tell. Here's a snipit:
"For Yahoo!, the deal appears to be a move to boost its search capabilities. Yahoo! is under growing pressure from the increasingly popular Google of Mountain View, Calif. Although Google currently powers Yahoo!'s search capabilities, Google has started to show signs of Yahoo!-like portal aspirations, leading some to question the future of the relationship."
As the search engine mergers continue to grow, it seems more than apparant that yahoo! and google are going to stay strong. For the tech-heads, Google still reigns supreme while Yahoo! offers more for the general consumer. Let's just hope they mix like oil and water. Rumors are flying that Google will go public in 2003. However, this might be a problem...now the great Google ideas will be corrupted by the corporate "cog". Or will it? Time will only tell. Here's a snipit:
"For Yahoo!, the deal appears to be a move to boost its search capabilities. Yahoo! is under growing pressure from the increasingly popular Google of Mountain View, Calif. Although Google currently powers Yahoo!'s search capabilities, Google has started to show signs of Yahoo!-like portal aspirations, leading some to question the future of the relationship."
Other Links Related to This Story
posted by Brian & Brian at 9:38 AM
0 comments - add your comment here!
![]()


